Recently I received a copy of a quite rare book. A book which was, according to the mythos surrounding it, pulled from circulation because of the explosive information that it contained.
The book is titled ‘Facts and Figures of the Belfast Pogrom 1920-1922’ by ‘G. B. Kenna’.
I must admit that this book was a real eye-opener for me personally. Not because I knew nothing of the violence in Belfast in those years, the so-called “First Troubles”, no, I have read about & researched quite extensively on that dark period of Ulster history.
The book was an eye-opener for an entirely different reason. You see, I had (somewhat naively) convinced myself that the historical revisionism & creation of baseless, propaganistic narratives by Irish nationalists was a recent phenomenon.
It is not. Distorting historical truth, sanitising the actions of violent Irish nationalist gangs & attempting to portray the nationalist minority as the world’s greatest victims is an exercise in propaganda as old as Irish nationalism itself.
In this blog post I will reproduce sections of the book, ‘Facts and Figures of the Belfast Pogrom 1920-1922’, without alteration. I will comment on them as little as possible. It will then be up to you, the reader, to decide if the book is an accurate, truthful & unbiased record of historical facts, or not.
We shall begin with the portion of the book which reads as follows –
“THE FIERY CROSS.
On the twelfth of July, 1920, at Finaghy, a suburb of Belfast, Sir Edward Carson delivered a very bitter speech—outlandish, one would say, for any man holding such a responsible position—to the assembled Orange brethren.
Of course, it was religiously read by all his followers in Ulster. The chief theme of the harangue was that the loyalists of Ulster were in imminent peril from Sinn Fein, that he was losing hope of the Government’s defending them, and that they must be “up and doing to protect themselves.” And these are not mere words, he said; ”I am sick of words without action.”
He dragged in the Catholic Hierarchy and the priests. The speech was altogether a good sample of the ”Raw-head-and-bloody-bones ” kind and well calculated to excite the fanatical elements.
Of course, as everyone knows, there was absolutely no menace of the kind.”
“Absolutely no menace of the kind”.
Perhaps the author of ‘Facts and Figures of the Belfast Pogrom 1920-1922’ was of the belief that the IRA were active in Ulster in 1920 (in point of fact they were active in 1919) merely to assist elderly ladies in crossing the road? Perhaps he believed that the IRA’s so-called ‘Northern Division’ were in fact Unionists who had armed themselves to defend the Unionist people from attacks by the ‘Southern Division’?
Had Sinn Fein/IRA not already killed dozens of people across the island by July, 1920? Had they not already attacked a Royal Irish Constabulary barracks in the city of Londonderry? Had they not already fired at Loyalists in that same city in April of that year, with the clear intent to kill as many as they could? Had they not already attacked, fired upon & then set ablaze a police station in Co. Armagh, just 2 months before?
Perhaps the IRA murder of a policeman in Derry in mid May had never happened? Maybe the massed attack on the police station in Crossgar, in which 200 men were involved, was a mere figment of Unionist imaginations?
Was another policeman not shot dead by “Sinn Feiners” in South Armagh at the start of June, an attack which also left a civilian dead? And wasn’t a Sinn Fein man shot dead in Cookstown, Co. Tyrone, on the 16th of June, whilst trying to murder police officers?
Who did the Ulster Volunteer Force engage in fierce fire-fights throughout the city of Londonderry between the 18th and the 25th of June? Perhaps the author of ‘Facts and Figures’ believed that it was Cossacks, or maybe Apaches who were locked in battle with the UVF?
“Absolutely no menace of the kind”, ha! Mr Kenna is not off to a very good start with his ‘Facts and Figures’!
Now let us move on to one of the main themes of the book- that the police & army stood idly by & did nothing to prevent disorder or protect the nationalist community.
Collusion?
I will supply the reader with just a handful of the very many examples of this entirely untruthful accusation against the forces of law & order.
“..the frenzied Protestant mobs, who in their strength defied a weak and indulgent police.”
“The other side [nationalists], finding themselves in most instances without any adequate military or police protection….”
“But who shall ever write the history of that innocent Catholic group in Ballymacarret, surrounded by coarse, savage enemies, in numbers ten to one, well armed, confident and often supported by the forces of the law!
“Most Rev. Dr. Macrory [sic], Catholic Bishop of Belfast, felt compelled to wire Lloyd-George about the lawlessness in Belfast and the butchery of his people. He protested also against the inactivity of the British military, who afforded little or no protection.”
“The throbbing of a police lorry is often but a sure sign that murder is abroad”
These examples should be ample to demonstrate one of the main themes of the book. One could well imagine, some of the more antiquated language aside, that the paragraphs above were from ‘An Poblacht’ or some other organ of Provisional IRA propaganda from our own time!
Indeed, all that is missing is the cry of “collusion”. A word that was perhaps unfamiliar to the erstwhile Mr. Kenna when he wrote (or perhaps Co-wrote) “Facts and Figures”.
Do these claims of police & army inaction stand up to scrutiny? No, they do not. For in the very same book in which we find these claims we also find the following-
“…the great majority of the casualties among the ‘Loyalists’ were due to the fire of the military and the RIC.”
“Among the dead…..was Alex Twittle [sic] an Orange sniper of whose death the following official report was issued; “a soldier was sniped at. He returned fire and shot the sniper dead” “
“The Orange mob…..had to be dispersed by military fire.”
“A notorious Orange sniper, H. Hazzard, was shot by the military.”
“It will be observed that the number of Catholics on the foregoing list is much larger than the number of Protestants. Of the latter, a big proportion were the victims of military fire. The Orange Party, being always the aggressors, were often made to pay for such aggression.”
Ah yes, the very same police and “military” who sometimes allegedly aided Loyalists & sometimes supposedly just stood around & watched as “innocent Catholics” were “pogromed”, were also killing “Orange” snipers & firing live rounds into crowds of Loyalists. I think I just heard the sound of a narrative collapsing!
Were the police & army being inactive when they were killing Unionists & Loyalists on the streets of Belfast? Perhaps the author believes that the Army & the RIC should have simply killed Unionists wholesale?
Perhaps the author of “Facts & Figures”, who was not ‘G. B. Kenna’ at all but rather the Roman Catholic priest John Hassan, genuinely believed that the police & army were biased because they killed only slightly (about 40%) more Protestants than Catholics?
Now we come to my very favourite part of this little book. The part where Hassan contradicts himself within the space of just a few paragraphs! The part that is indicative of the attitude of Irish nationalists, the part of the book where two Irish republican extremists are presented as being purer than the driven snow.
I will keep you in suspense no longer.
“On the evening of April 23rd, two members of the Auxiliary Police were fired at & shot in Donegall Place. During curfew the following night Patrick & Daniel Duffin, two of the most respected & well-conducted Catholic young men in the whole city, were very brutally murdered in their homes by members of the local RIC.
Wow. Two Auxiliary Police “were fired at & shot”? Does the author not mean ‘Two Auxiliary Police men narrowly survived an IRA murder attempt’?
‘Father’ Hassan would have the reader believe that the two auxiliaries were hit by a wayward youth firing a BB gun!
The most startling thing though is his description of the two men who were not just brutally murdered but “very brutally murdered” the following night, apparently in retaliation for the attempted murder of the two police officers.
In his own words these two unfortunate young men were two of the finest young gentlemen in all of Belfast! Two fine, upstanding, innocent men. Shame that he ruins their reputation just three paragraphs later, on the very next page in fact, by reporting that-
“…..their coffins were draped in the Republican colours & carried behind the hearse by relays of the IRA.”
Oh. Oh dear. So the brothers Duffin were two of the most respected and well-conducted young men in the whole of Belfast but just happened to be members of the IRA as well? Maybe they had joined an illegal, blood-soaked, subversive terror organisation by accident? Maybe they were in the community outreach section of the IRA?
If it was not so tragic it would be hilarious. It seems that many in the Irish nationalist community regard dead members of murder gangs as “innocent”, not just in 1922 but to this very day.
Wrong on Every Count
The propagandist Hassan filled his little book with lies, misrepresentations, half-truths & distortions. So much so that many historians, even those from an Irish nationalist community background, now completely discount “Facts and Figures of the Belfast Pogrom” as a reliable source of information.
For example, Hassan’s figures on the numbers killed are wildly inaccurate & have been shown as such both by people who lived through that period of violence & by numerous historians since. Four of those named by Hassan as being victims of the so-called “pogrom”, were in fact victims of accidental shootings, fatally wounded when guns went off unintentionally.
Two of those listed by Hassan were victims of incidents which happened outside Belfast. On the 4th of November, 1920, RIC Sgt. Sam Lucas died in a Belfast hospital – however his wounds had been received in the course of an IRA attack on the RIC barracks in Tempo, Co. Fermanagh.
Hassan also records the death of a “Private Hepworth” on the 25th of February, 1921. This might refer to the death of RAF Flight Officer Hepworth Ambrose Vyvian Hill, who was shot when he failed to answer the challenge of a sentry at Aldergrove Aerodrome in Co. Antrim, many miles from Belfast.
At least three deaths on Hassan’s list were not politically related at all. For example; William Bell, who died on the 2nd of December, 1920, was killed when part of a wall fell on him during a thunderstorm.
About half a dozen other victims were also double counted by Hassan, no doubt in order to “bulk up” the number of nationalist victims.
Six of the deaths listed by Hassan could not be corroborated by reports in any of the Belfast newspapers, meaning that they could very well have been total fabrications, added to the list of victims by Hassan for the reason stated above.
A final death as a result of an accidental shooting was not included in Hassan’s list, undoubtedly because it did not quite fit the priest’s own narrative. Joseph Burns, who died from gun shot wounds on the night of the 12th – 13th January, 1922. Burns is named as a member of the IRA on the Co. Antrim republican memorial in Belfast’s Milltown Cemetery, although for years, an element of mystery surrounded his inclusion on this memorial, as his death was not reported in any of the Belfast newspapers at the time.
In later years the mystery was cleared up when republican sources admitted that Burns, alongside two other members of an IRA gang, was accidentally killed whilst cleaning weapons. In 1932 Burns’ mother admitted that “I had to take his death quietly as the police were making active enquiries in the case.”
For many years it has been strongly rumoured that several members of the Official IRA & the Provisional IRA, during the more recent conflict here, also met with violent deaths that were subsequently covered up, for various reasons. How many more mothers had to quietly take the death of a son, in order to avoid police attention or save Irish nationalist extremist gangs from embarrassment or awkward questions?
When is a Pogrom not a Pogrom?
The Kishinev Pogrom took place between the 19th and the 21st of April, 1903, its victims being the Jewish community within that city. Kishinev (Chișinău) is now the capital of the independent republic of Moldova but in 1903 was a provincial city of the Russian Empire. During the pogrom of 1903, a total of 49 Jews were killed, 1,500 Jewish homes were destroyed & dozens of businesses wrecked.
Why do I include these events in a blog post about events in Belfast in 1920-22? Well I include them because the Kishinev Pogrom of 1903 is fairly typical of what most people mean when they use the term ‘pogrom’. There are dozens of other examples.
Notice that fatalities in Kishinev include only members of one community; the community which was being targeted.
The Jewish minority in Kishinev did not kill anybody. No Jews were accidentally killed whilst cleaning rifles. No Russian police officers were shot. No retaliation was carried out.
Contrast that with what was happening in Belfast in 1920-22.
If events in Belfast, between July, 1920 and October, 1922, could truly be described as a “pogrom” wouldn’t that mean that almost all of the victims should be from the minority community?
Even if 70-75% of the victims were from the minority community, using the term “pogrom” would probably be justifiable.
Were 70-75% of the victims from the minority community? No. They most certainly were not.
Approximately 498 people died during the violence in Belfast during 1920-22. Of those killed 280 were Irish nationalists, of whom at least 26 (almost 10%) were members of the IRA. A further 37 of the total number killed were members of the Army, RIC/RUC & Ulster Special Constabulary. That means that 181 of those killed were Unionists/Loyalists, or at the very least from a Unionist/Loyalist background.
Those numbers do not add up to a “pogrom”!
An spasm of intercommunal violence? Yes. A tragic episode of civil unrest? Yes. A Pogrom? Definitely not.
In fact, in the first 18 months of the so-called “pogrom” nationalists killed more people than anyone else. 84 Unionists died in that time, compared to 81 nationalists.
Does that sound like a “pogrom” to you?
Of course, the truth seems to be an alien concept for those extremists & fanatics who call themselves Irish nationalists.
What other group of people, anywhere on Earth, could engage in a campaign of murderous violence & then attempt to portray themselves as the victims of a “pogrom”?
What other group could, with a straight face, describe members of an armed & violent organisation as “innocent”?
What other group of people would try to convince the world that they are helpless victims of sectarian violence, when in fact they are the worst perpetrators of such violence?
I will leave you with the words of Mr Hassan; “The Turk has the Armenian in the Dock & is close to securing a conviction.”
Contrary to what Mr Hassan believed though, Irish nationalists are not the Armenian but the Turk!
You must be logged in to post a comment.